Empire vs. EMPIRE: Fox Defends Its Hit Television Series Against Lanham Act Claims

Whats the News?

Twentieth Century Fox Television recently filed a motion for summary judgment in a dispute with record label Empire Distribution, Inc. over the name of Foxs popular television series Empire. Empire Distribution has alleged that Foxs use of Empire in the shows title and on its soundtracks constitutes trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, but Fox claims that it is shielded from any such claims by the broad protection afforded to expressive works under the First Amendment.

Background on the Dispute

Foxs series Empire is a musical drama that follows the story of a fictional hip hop music and entertainment company, Empire Enterprises, as members of the shows central family struggle for control over the business. The show, which is currently in its second season, has been a hit both in terms of ratings and critical reception. In March, Fox preemptively filed suit in federal district court in California, seeking a declaratory judgment that the shows title does not violate any trademark rights held by Empire Distribution. Fox was prompted to file after Empire Distribution, a hip hop record label that has released albums by artists such as Snoop Dogg and Kendrick Lamar, sent a letter to Fox claiming that its use of Empire was a violation of the Lanham Acts trademark infringement and dilution provisions. In June, the record label responded with counterclaims, formally alleging that Empire violates its rights in the trademarks EMPIRE, EMPIRE RECORDINGS, and EMPIRE DISTRIBUTION (the EMPIRE Marks).

Foxs Recent MotionFox recently filed a motion for summary judgment, asking the court to hold that Empire Distributions claims are barred by the First Amendment. Under the seminal trademark case Rogers v. Grimaldi, the Lanham Act does not apply to titles of expressive works, such as television shows or musical works, except in two circumstances(1) when the title has no artistic value to the underlying work or (2) when the title is explicitly misleading as to the source of the underlying work. According to Fox, neither exception applies. In its motion, Fox argues that the shows title has considerable artistic value, as it is an on-the-nose reminder of the shows central themes: its Empire State setting; Empire Enterprises, the fictional business at the center of the show; and the figurative empire over which the characters struggle. Further, Fox claimed, the title does not explicitly mislead consumers, as Fox has not stated that Empire Distribution is involved in or otherwise associated with the series.

Fox further asserts that in addition to First Amendment protection, the record labels Lanham Act claims still fail, as no consumer confusion between Empire and Empire Distribution is likely. According to Fox, Empire Distributions marks are commercially weak and exist in a crowded field of EMPIRE marks, entitling them to a relatively narrow scope of protection. Further, Fox claims that consumers are unlikely to encounter Empire and the EMPIRE Marks in the same channels of trade, given that one is the title of a television series and the other is the name of a record label.

Please contact Anthony V. Lupo, Amy E. Salomon, or Thorne Maginnis with any questions.

http://fashioncounsel.com/articles/empire-vs-empire-fox-defends-its-hit-television-series-against-lanham-act-claims