Educators Did Not Have Right To Privacy In Records That Did Not Contain Personal Information And Were Not Investigative


The Supreme Court differed with the test court as well as Court of Appeals, and also bought that the documents be divulged without any kind of redactions at all. The Court additionally specified that the documents were not vital to the defense of personal privacy, for the exact same factors explained above.In recap, the Supreme Court discovered that the documents were not secured by the Public Records Act and also must be divulged to the media electrical outlets. The Court turned around the choice of the Court of Appeals and also test court as well as bought that un-redacted variations of the documents be disclosed.This Supreme Court instance is one of a number of Washington choices in the last year that have actually expanded the range of staff member info topic to disclosure under the Act.

The test court located that Predisiks as well as Katkes identifications were shielded from disclosure, however not the documents themselves, as well as got that the documents be divulged with Predisiks and also Katkes names redacted. The Court of Appeals attested the test courts choice.

The Supreme Court differed with the test court as well as Court of Appeals, as well as got that the documents be revealed without any type of redactions at all. The Court likewise specified that the documents were not important to the defense of personal privacy, for the very same factors defined above.In recap, the Supreme Court discovered that the documents were not shielded by the Public Records Act and also need to be revealed to the media electrical outlets. The Court turned around the choice of the Court of Appeals as well as test court as well as purchased that un-redacted variations of the documents be disclosed.This Supreme Court situation is one of numerous Washington choices in the last year that have actually widened the extent of staff member info topic to disclosure under the Act.