Impeachment|Issue 13 Prosecution of D for grand larceny. In feedback, D plans to call W2, W1s previous partner, to indicate that W1 has a clinical background of deceptions and also memory loss that influenced his capability to remember as well as regard fact. Thinking D removes all witness-competency, advantage, as well as relevance obstacles, the court would certainly evaluate the probative worth of the impeachment versus its threat of unjust bias, complication of the problems, misguiding of the court, unnecessary hold-up, and also cumulativeness of the proof.